Brazil's Retirement Visa on a Pension: What Resolution 40 Actually Requires, the “Rentista” Route That Is Not in the Rule, and the Tax Your Pension Pays From Day 184

Published September 20, 2026.

Brazil's retirement visa is a temporary visa, or an in-country residence authorization, created by Resolution 40 of the National Immigration Council (CNIg) of October 2, 2019, for the immigrant who is retired or the beneficiary of a survivor's pension and who proves a monthly transfer to Brazil of at least US$ 2,000 in foreign currency. The pension is the basis: article 3 asks for proof of retirement and of the ability to transfer that amount, or of receipt of a survivor's pension in that amount, and admits “other regular sources of income” only to complement the required amount, “if necessary”. There is no “rentista” visa in the text, no minimum age and no formula per dependent — the “permanent visa” and the “US$ 1,000 per dependent” that circulate come from Resolution 45/2000, which article 6 revoked, and the “R$ 6,000 plus R$ 2,000 per additional dependent” still published on one official page is in neither Resolution as read. The initial residence is of up to two years, renewable under another Resolution; the permit does not convert into anything by its own text and, being a temporary visa, its years do not count toward naturalization. And the retirement visa says nothing about tax. What decides your Brazilian taxes is the Receita Federal's clock: on the day you complete 184 days of presence in any twelve-month window you become a tax resident, and from that day your foreign pension enters the monthly carnê-leão, transferred to Brazil or not, under the 0-to-27.5% table with the 2026 reduction. The over-65 exemption does not reach it, because the law lists the payers it covers and a foreign payer is not among them — unless the payer is an equivalent institution in a country whose treaty with Brazil carries a non-discrimination clause (Instruction 1,500, article 6, § 3), a treaty the United States does not have; the serious-illness exemption does reach it, by the Receita's own answer; the tax you paid abroad is credited only under a treaty or reciprocity, and only if not credited or refunded abroad — the United States has no treaty, but the Receita recognizes reciprocity for US federal income tax; and a foreign retirement fund sits, by name, in Law 14,754's list of “financial investments” taxed at 15% on redemption, while a pension goes to the carnê-leão — which line reaches a given plan depends on how the plan is built, a reading this article marks, not settles.

The question reaches me in two halves that the pages answer separately and the reader lives together. Can I get Brazil's retirement visa on Social Security? Is there a “rentista” visa for passive income? Is there an age requirement? Does Brazil tax my pension, and what about my 401(k)? Sometimes it comes with a page pasted in — “must be at least 60 years old”; “Add USD $1,000/month for each dependent”; “A Permanent Visa may be granted”; “Spend 183 days in any 12-month window, and you become a Brazilian tax resident”. None of those sentences is in the text that governs it. The answer follows the searches themselves, with the Portuguese text of each provision beside a working translation and a link to the source. Where the law is silent I say so and stop. The article states no consular fee, no processing time, no rate that is not in a text, and names no other firm.

What the retirement visa gives you — and what it does not

Before the provisions, the map: the question that arrives, the text that decides it, the answer the text produces. Everything after the table is the demonstration, in the same order.

The table already shows two things. The visa and the tax are decided by two agencies that never read each other's text: the consulates and the Ministry of Justice apply a Resolution with no tax rule in it; the Receita applies instructions with no visa in them. And every figure that circulates has a home; the rest of this article puts each back where it lives.

Resolution 40/2019, by the text: who the retirement visa is for

The rule is Resolution 40 of the National Immigration Council — the Conselho Nacional de Imigração, CNIg — dated October 2, 2019 and published in the Official Gazette (Section 1, page 70, as the Ministry's document repository records). Its heading: Dispõe sobre a concessão e os procedimentos para emissão de visto temporário e de autorização de residência com base em aposentadoria e/ou benefício de pensão por morte. — the grant of a temporary visa and of a residence authorization based on retirement and/or a survivor's pension. Seven articles. Article 1 draws the boundary in one sentence:

Art. 1º O visto temporário poderá ser concedido ao imigrante aposentado ou beneficiário de pensão por morte, que comprovar a transferência mensal ao Brasil da importância, em moeda estrangeira, em montante igual ou superior a US$ 2.000,00 (dois mil dólares).

Article 1. The temporary visa may be granted to the immigrant who is retired or the beneficiary of a survivor's pension, who proves the monthly transfer to Brazil of an amount, in foreign currency, equal to or greater than US$ 2,000.00 (two thousand dollars).

Four words carry it. Temporary visa — the visa of the immigrant who, in article 14 of the Migration Law, Law 13,445 of 2017, comes com o intuito de estabelecer residência por tempo determinado — for a determinate time. Retired — aposentado: undefined, with no paying institution named and no mention of “Social Security”, “state pension” or “company pension”. Or the beneficiary of a survivor's pension — the second person the visa exists for. And the monthly transfer to Brazil — not held or shown; transferred, monthly. The Resolution states no age.

Two doors, one term. From outside Brazil, articles 2 and 3, before the consular authority; article 3, sole paragraph: O prazo inicial da residência do imigrante portador do visto temporário de que trata o art. 1º será de até dois anos. — up to two years. From inside Brazil, article 4: the person already here poderá ser concedida autorização de residência pelo Ministério da Justiça e Segurança Pública — may be granted a residence authorization by the Ministry of Justice — on the general documents of the Council's Resolution 1 of 2017 (not read for this article) and the article 3 proofs; its sole paragraph repeats the term: O prazo inicial da residência prevista no caput será de até dois anos. Renewal is one line, article 5: A renovação do prazo de residência será disciplinada em Resolução Normativa específica. — a specific Resolution, the subject of a later section.

On the label. “VITEM XIV” is not the name of the retirement visa but the consular category — temporary visa, class XIV — under which the posts file it. Porto titles its page “Visto Temporário XIV - Aposentadoria ou Pensão”, cites Resolução Normativa nº40/2019 do CNIg and describes its applicant as the immigrant aposentado ou beneficiário de pensão por morte que comprovar a capacidade de transferência mensal ao Brasil da importância, em moeda estrangeira, em montante igual ou superior a US$ 2.000,00 (dois mil dólares); Houston, “VITEM XIV - Retirement and Digital Nomad”; Stockholm, “RETIREMENT VISA (VITEM XIV - RN 40)”. The same category covers the digital nomad's Resolution 45/2021 and its different figures — the firm's article on the digital nomad visa separates the two. On the Resolution's currency, the Ministry's repository records no express revocation; I have not read the Council's later Resolutions against it.

The instrument. Fix which of the two people in article 1 you are and obtain first the document that proves it — the award letter or pension certificate, in your name — the US$ 2,000 is the monthly transfer you must show you can make, not a floor for the pension itself. Then choose the door by where you will be standing; both give up to two years.

US$ 2,000 a month, transferred: the pension is the basis — and what “other income” can do

Article 3 is the article the internet paraphrases most and quotes least; its third item is where the “rentista” idea is born and dies:

Art. 3º Deverão, também, ser apresentados à autoridade consular: I - comprovação de aposentadoria e de capacidade de transferir para o País a quantia, em moeda estrangeira, em montante igual ou superior a US$ 2.000,00 (dois mil dólares); II - comprovação de recebimento de pensão por morte em montante igual ou superior a US$ 2.000,00 (dois mil dólares); ou III - outras fontes regulares de rendimento para complementar o valor exigido no art. 1º desta Resolução Normativa, se necessário. Parágrafo único. O prazo inicial da residência do imigrante portador do visto temporário de que trata o art. 1º será de até dois anos.

Article 3. The following shall also be presented to the consular authority: I – proof of retirement and of the ability to transfer to the country the sum, in foreign currency, in an amount equal to or greater than US$ 2,000.00 (two thousand dollars); II – proof of receipt of a survivor's pension in an amount equal to or greater than US$ 2,000.00 (two thousand dollars); or III – other regular sources of income to complement the amount required in article 1 of this Resolution, if necessary. Sole paragraph. The initial residence period of the immigrant holding the temporary visa of article 1 shall be of up to two years.

Read the items with their conjunctions. Item I is the retiree's proof, in two halves: comprovação de aposentadoria and the ability to transfer US$ 2,000 a month. Item II is the pensioner's. Item III is not a third route but a supplement — outras fontes regulares de rendimento para complementar o valor exigido — with a condition, se necessário. A retiree with a US$ 1,400 pension and US$ 800 of rent is inside item III; a person with US$ 4,000 of rent and no pension is not inside article 1 at all, and item III has nothing to complement. That is the whole “rentista visa” question, answered in nine words.

The consular pages read it the same way. Houston, updated August 26, 2022, lists the retiree's documents in three lines, the third being item III:

For retirees and pensioners: Proof of retirement and ability to transfer monthly to Brazil the amount equal to or greater than US$2,000.00 (must enclose official letter from bank, signed by applicant’s account manager, informing that bank will be able to transfer monthly the amount equal or greater than US$ 2,000.00 to applicant’s bank account in Brazil); Proof of receipt of monthly pension for death in the amount equal to or greater than US$ 2,000.00; If necessary, proof of other regular sources of income to complement the amount of US$ 2,000.00;

Porto, updated June 11, 2025, has item 10 in Portuguese: Comprovação de outras fontes regulares de rendimento para complementar o valor exigido, se necessário;. Stockholm, updated July 6, 2026, is explicit about what “other income” may be: Proof of retirement/pension certificate from the pension authorities / complementary pension from other providers ( You can also use income from renting of a house for example) — a house rented out as a complement to the pension certificate, not instead of it. Three posts, one reading: the pension first, the top-up if needed; and the Houston line describes the transfer proof — a letter from your bank on its ability to transfer the amount monthly to your account in Brazil.

Now the reader with no pension. Item I says aposentadoria; whether a particular benefit — an old-age benefit, a company pension, an annuity — is “retirement” in the consulate's eyes is a question the Resolution does not answer, and I do not answer it for any benefit by name: the pages publish “proof of retirement”, a “pension certificate from the pension authorities” and a “complementary pension from other providers”. Capital has the route of the investor visa; family, the family reunion covered in marrying a Brazilian. The digital nomad's US$ 1,500 or US$ 18,000, with no transfer, belong to the other Resolution under the same label.

The instrument. Build the file on item I or item II, never on item III alone: the pension document in your name with the monthly amount, and the bank's letter on its ability to transfer at least US$ 2,000 a month to a Brazilian account in your name. If the pension is below 2,000, add the item III income — rental contracts, dividend statements — described as a top-up. Do not present rent or dividends as “retirement income”; the Resolution has no such category.

No “rentista” visa, no minimum age, no dependent formula: the numbers that circulate and the text that does not contain them

Three numbers travel with this visa that the Resolution does not contain: an age — “at least 60 years old”; a dependent formula — “Add USD $1,000/month for each dependent”; and a figure in reais — “R$ 6,000 … two legal dependents … R$ 2,000 per additional dependent”. The age has no home in any text I have read; the per-dependent figure has a home, and it is a revoked one — Resolution 45/2000, whose article 1 gave a permanent visa on US$ 2,000 a month with up to two dependents and, in § 1, US$ 1,000 for each dependent beyond two; the figure in reais is in neither Resolution as read. Article 6 of Resolution 40:

Art. 6º Fica revogada a Resolução Normativa nº 45, de 14 de março de 2000.

Article 6. Resolution No. 45 of March 14, 2000, is revoked.

Resolution 45 of 2000 sits in the Ministry of Justice's repository, marked revoked, as published in the Official Gazette of March 16, 2000 (Section 1, page 29); I read that publication, not any later amendment. Its article 1 gave the retiree a permanent visa — the vocabulary one consular page still uses — on the same US$ 2,000 a month, “accompanied by up to two dependents”, and its § 1 added US$ 1,000 for each dependent beyond two:

Art. 1° O Ministério das Relações Exteriores poderá […] visto permanente a estrangeiro aposentado, acompanhado de até dois dependentes, que comprovar poder transferir mensalmente para o Brasil importância igual ou superior a US$ 2.000,00 (dois mil dólares americanos). […] § 1° Se o interessado tiver mais de dois dependentes, será obrigado a transferir, ainda, quantia equivalente a US$ 1.000,00 (mil dólares americanos) para cada dependente que exceder a dois.

Article 1. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs may […] a permanent visa to a retired foreigner, accompanied by up to two dependents, who proves the ability to transfer monthly to Brazil an amount equal to or greater than US$ 2,000.00 (two thousand US dollars). […] § 1. If the applicant has more than two dependents, they will also be required to transfer an amount equivalent to US$ 1,000.00 (one thousand US dollars) for each dependent beyond two.

That is where “permanent visa” and “US$ 1,000 per dependent” come from: a text revoked in 2019 that summaries keep reprinting as if in force. The formula in reais is in neither text as I read them — not in Resolution 40, and not in Resolution 45/2000 as published in 2000; whether a later amendment of that revoked Resolution ever carried it, I have not traced. Where it still stands, seven years after the revocation, is the Foreign Ministry's own portal. The Embassy in Abu Dhabi keeps a page titled “Visa for living in Brazil after retirement”, published August 4, 2022, whose first paragraph reads:

A Permanent Visa may be granted to the retired foreign citizens wishing to live in Brazil, provided that they are already in use of their pension, and legally allowed to transfer to Brazil a regular monthly income in a foreign currency, pension included, equivalent to a minimum of R$ 6.000,00 (six thousand reais). This minimum required income will allow for the applicant to take two legal dependents to Brazil. For every additional dependent, an additional amount of R$ 2.000,00 (two thousand reais) per month will be required. Applicants must lodge their application in person (not required for the dependents).

Every element of that paragraph is answered by a provision. “Permanent Visa” — article 1, visto temporário, and up to two years; the firm's article on the investor visa has already dismantled the “VIPER” nickname built on the old permanent visa. “R$ 6.000,00” — article 1: US$ 2,000, transferred. “Two legal dependents” and “R$ 2.000,00 … per additional dependent” — Resolution 40 does not mention dependents once; the two dependents are Resolution 45's, revoked. I do not say the Embassy applies that formula; I say its page, as I write, publishes it. The same page's document line, lower down, is closer to the text — Document from the Government’s Department of Retirement Funds or/and private pension provider , stating the applicant’s retired status, the pension’s amount in the foreign currency, and confirming that the pension can legally be transferred to Brazil. — item I of article 3, in other words.

“US$ 1,000 per dependent” is not in Resolution 40 nor on any of the four consular pages read for this article; it is § 1 of article 1 of the revoked Resolution 45/2000, and summaries repeat it from one another as if it were still law. “At least 60” has a plausible face, so a page writes the threshold the Resolution declined to write. The Resolution requires a status, proved by a document, at whatever age a pension is in payment: a retired police officer at fifty-two with US$ 2,000 transferred monthly is inside article 1; a sixty-five-year-old with US$ 5,000 of dividends and no pension is not.

The instrument. Take the Resolution to the appointment — printed, articles 1, 3 and 6 marked — and, where a post asks for an age, a per-dependent amount or a figure in reais, ask for the requirement in writing with the provision it rests on. A consulate may ask for documents the Resolution does not list — Porto says so: A Autoridade Consular poderá solicitar eventuais documentos adicionais. — but no post can replace the Resolution's threshold with a revoked one and call it the rule.

The documents: article 2, and the two that take longest

Article 2 is the consular list, and it is short:

Art. 2º Para solicitar o visto de que trata o art. 1º, o imigrante deverá apresentar à autoridade consular os seguintes documentos: I - documento de viagem válido; II - certificado internacional de imunização, quando assim exigido pela Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária - Anvisa; III - seguro de saúde válido no território nacional; IV - comprovante de pagamento de emolumentos consulares; V - formulário de solicitação de visto preenchido; VI - comprovante de meio de transporte de entrada no território nacional; e VII - atestado de antecedentes criminais expedido pelo país de origem ou, a critério da autoridade consular, e de acordo com as peculiaridades do país onde o visto foi solicitado, documento equivalente.

Article 2. To apply for the visa of article 1, the immigrant shall present the following documents to the consular authority: I – a valid travel document; II – an international certificate of immunization, when so required by the National Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa); III – health insurance valid in the national territory; IV – proof of payment of the consular fees; V – the completed visa application form; VI – proof of the means of transport into the national territory; and VII – a criminal-record certificate issued by the country of origin or, at the discretion of the consular authority and according to the peculiarities of the country where the visa is applied for, an equivalent document.

Seven items, and two govern your calendar. The first is item VII, the criminal-record certificate, which the posts ask for in a form they can accept: Porto lists it as Atestado de antecedentes criminais expedido pelo país de origem devidamente apostilado — duly apostilled. Apostille is the Hague Convention route the firm's article on marrying a Brazilian describes; the certificate's validity window — ninety days from issue, on the Stockholm page — runs while you gather the rest. The second is the article 3 pair, the pension document and the bank's transfer letter, from two institutions with their own timetables. Health insurance (item III) and the entry ticket (item VI) come last. I state no consular fee: item IV requires proof of its payment and the Resolution states no amount. From inside Brazil, article 4 sends the applicant to the Ministry of Justice with the general documents of Resolution 1 of 2017 and the same article 3 proofs.

The instrument. Order the criminal-record certificate first and apostille it at home; write to the pension institution for the award letter or certificate the same week; then ask your bank, in writing, for the letter on its ability to transfer US$ 2,000 a month to a Brazilian account. Everything else in article 2 can be assembled in the last month.

Two years, the renewal, and why the retirement visa alone does not make you a citizen

Three texts decide what the search box completes for you — retirement visa to permanent residency, to citizenship. The first is article 5 of the Resolution: the renewal será disciplinada em Resolução Normativa específica, and nothing in Resolution 40 converts the permit into anything. The second is the Council's general rule on renewal, Resolution 30 of June 12, 2018 — read as adopted; amended by Resolution 41/2019, which I have not read — whose heading reads Disciplina a renovação do prazo de autorização de residência ou a alteração para prazo indeterminado and whose article 1 allowed the then-competent Ministry of Labor to renovar o prazo inicial de residência concedido, pelo período de até dois anos ou a alterar o prazo de residência para prazo indeterminado, nos termos do art. 142, § 3º, do Decreto nº 9.199, de 2017 — up to two more years, or an indeterminate term. Article 142, § 3, of Decree 9,199 of 2017: once the initial period has run, the granting body poderá, por meio de requerimento do imigrante, promover a renovação do prazo inicial de residência pelo período de até dois anos ou a alteração do prazo de residência para prazo indeterminado. Two outcomes, at the body's decision on your request; which one a retiree obtains is not written in Resolution 40, and a page telling you the visa “converts to permanent residency after two years” is describing one of two outcomes as if it were the rule.

The third text decides citizenship, and it is the sentence nobody publishes. Decree 9,199, article 221:

Art. 221. Para fins de contagem dos prazos de residência mencionados nas exigências para obtenção da naturalização ordinária e extraordinária, serão considerados os períodos em que o imigrante tenha passado a residir no País por prazo indeterminado.

Article 221. For the purpose of counting the residence periods mentioned in the requirements for obtaining ordinary and extraordinary naturalization, the periods in which the immigrant came to reside in the country for an indeterminate term shall be considered.

Only residence for an indeterminate term counts toward naturalization. The retirement visa is a temporary visa — residence por tempo determinado, in article 14 of the Migration Law — and article 221 does not count a day of it. The answer to “does time on the retirement visa count toward Brazilian citizenship?” is therefore not slowly but no: the residence period naturalization requires begins on the day an indeterminate-term residence begins — the firm's article on marrying a Brazilian walks through that count for the spouse of a Brazilian. A forum sentence that twelve months of presence in the last two years let a retiree “apply for naturalization” is answered by article 221: presence is not the measure; the term of the residence is.

The instrument. Plan the permit for what it is — up to two years of residence for a retiree — and, before they run, plan the renewal request under the general rule with the indeterminate term asked for expressly, so that the day article 221 starts counting is a day you chose.

The tax clock: day 184, not the visa — and the non-resident before it

Nothing in Resolution 40 says a word about tax, and nothing in the Receita Federal's rule on tax residency says a word about the retirement visa: for a temporary visa without a Brazilian employment relationship, tax residency is decided by days (the in-country door of article 4 — the person already in Brazil — raises the vocabulary question the investor-visa article discusses). The rule is Normative Instruction SRF 208 of 2002, and article 2 is the machine:

Art. 2° Considera-se residente no Brasil, a pessoa física: […] III - que ingresse no Brasil: a) com visto permanente, na data da chegada; b) com visto temporário: […] 2. na data em que complete 184 dias, consecutivos ou não, de permanência no Brasil, dentro de um período de até doze meses;

Article 2. The following individuals are considered resident in Brazil: […] III – one who enters Brazil: a) holding a permanent visa — on the date of arrival; b) holding a temporary visa: […] 2. on the date on which they complete 184 days of presence in Brazil, consecutive or not, within a period of up to twelve months;

The mirror image is article 3, IV, “a”: the person who enters with a temporary visa e permaneça até 183 dias, consecutivos ou não, em um período de até doze meses is a non-resident. Both numbers are real, and the page that says “Spend 183 days in any 12-month window, and you become a Brazilian tax resident” has them the wrong way around: 183 is the last day of non-residence, 184 the first day of residence, and the window is any period of up to twelve months, not a calendar year. The firm's article on the investor visa and tax residency owns this clock — how the window restarts, why “183 or 184” is a false choice — and I do not rewrite its arithmetic; the retiree's clock is the same clock, and the pension is what crosses the line.

Up to day 183 you are a non-resident under article 3: Brazil taxes Brazilian-source income only, at source, and a pension paid by a foreign institution is outside it. The false half of “no tax before 183 days” is the generalization — rent from a Brazilian tenant, interest from a Brazilian bank, a Brazilian pension are taxed at source, at rates that vary by type, after written notice of non-resident status to the payer (article 3, § 2). The firm's article on non-resident taxation in Brazil sets the rates out by type — including, in its section on pensions, a Brazilian pension paid to a non-resident — and the retiree before day 184 is exactly the non-resident it describes.

The instrument. Keep a day count from the first entry — passport stamps, boarding passes, the Federal Police's record — and know your 184th day before it arrives; in the non-resident months, send any Brazilian payer a written statement of your status before the first payment. Your CPF is needed for those acts and for the account the visa's transfers go into; the firm's article on opening a Brazilian bank account as a non-resident covers both.

Day 184: your foreign pension enters the carnê-leão

On day 184 the base changes from Brazilian-source income to worldwide income, and two instructions say how the foreign pension is taxed. The first is article 16 of Instruction 208, with the credit rule in its § 1:

Art. 16. Os demais rendimentos recebidos de fontes situadas no exterior por residente no Brasil, transferidos ou não para o País, estão sujeitos à tributação sob a forma de recolhimento mensal obrigatório (carnê-leão), no mês do recebimento, e na Declaração de Ajuste Anual. § 1º O imposto de renda pago em país com o qual o Brasil tenha firmado acordo, tratado ou convenção internacional prevendo a compensação, ou naquele em que haja reciprocidade de tratamento, pode ser considerado como redução do imposto devido no Brasil, desde que não seja compensado ou restituído no exterior.

Article 16. Other income received from sources located abroad by a resident of Brazil, whether or not transferred to the country, is subject to taxation in the form of the mandatory monthly payment (carnê-leão), in the month of receipt, and in the Annual Adjustment Return. § 1. Income tax paid in a country with which Brazil has signed an international agreement, treaty or convention providing for the credit, or in a country where there is reciprocity of treatment, may be taken as a reduction of the tax due in Brazil, provided it is not credited or refunded abroad.

The second is Normative Instruction RFB 1,500 of 2014, the Receita's general instruction on individual income tax, article 53:

Art. 53. Está sujeita ao pagamento mensal do imposto a pessoa física residente no País que recebe: […] II - rendimentos ou quaisquer outros valores de fontes do exterior, tais como trabalho assalariado ou não assalariado, uso, exploração ou ocupação de bens móveis ou imóveis, transferidos ou não para o Brasil, lucros e dividendos;

Article 53. The individual resident in the country who receives the following is subject to the monthly payment of the tax: […] II – income or any other amounts from sources abroad, such as employed or self-employed work, the use, exploitation or occupation of movable or immovable property, transferred or not to Brazil, profits and dividends;

Three phrases decide the retiree's case. Any other amounts from sources abroad — the list is illustrative; a pension is such an amount. Transferred or not — transferidos ou não para o Brasil: the US$ 2,000 the visa makes you transfer is taxed on the same footing as the part left abroad. Monthly, and in the annual return — computed, by article 55 of Instruction 1,500, com base nos valores das tabelas progressivas mensais constantes do Anexo II, observada a tabela de redução constante do Anexo X, paid by the last business day of the following month (Instruction 208, article 16, § 5), and carried into the annual return, where by article 54 the monthly amounts devem integrar a base de cálculo do imposto na DAA, sendo o imposto pago considerado antecipação do apurado nessa declaração. Question 173 of the Receita's questions-and-answers publication for 2026 says the same about pensions by name:

O recebimento de aposentadorias e pensões - exceto pensões alimentícias - são tributados no Brasil por meio do recolhimento mensal (carnê-leão) na data de seu recebimento e na Declaração de Ajuste Anual - DAA. Contudo, para se determinar a tributação correspondente a esses rendimentos, é necessário verificar a existência de Acordo ou Convenção firmado entre o país de origem dos rendimentos e o Brasil para evitar a dupla tributação, devendo ser observadas as disposições neles contidas. Na inexistência de tratados ou reciprocidade de tratamento, não é permitida a compensação do imposto pago no exterior.

The receipt of retirement pensions and pensions — except alimony — is taxed in Brazil through the monthly payment (carnê-leão) on the date of receipt and in the Annual Adjustment Return (DAA). However, to determine the taxation of that income it is necessary to check whether an Agreement or Convention for the avoidance of double taxation exists between the country of origin of the income and Brazil, and to observe its provisions. Where there is no treaty or reciprocity of treatment, the credit of the tax paid abroad is not allowed.

The conversion is § 1 of article 53: em dólar dos Estados Unidos da América, pelo valor fixado pela autoridade monetária do país de origem dos rendimentos na data do recebimento e, em seguida, em reais mediante utilização do valor do dólar fixado para compra pelo Banco Central do Brasil para o último dia útil da 1ª (primeira) quinzena do mês anterior ao do recebimento do rendimento — the Central Bank's buying rate for the last business day of the first half of the month before receipt, not the rate of the day the pension arrived. The monthly table is the law's — Law 11,482 of 2007, article 1, XII, as worded by Law 15,191 of 2025 — with the 2026 reduction that Law 9,250 of 1995 received in its article 3-A from Law 15,270 of 2025:

The last row is what pages mislabel as an “exemption threshold”. It is a reduction of the tax, not an exemption of the pension — up to R$ 5,000.00 of monthly taxable income, de modo que o imposto devido seja zero; from R$ 5,000.01 to R$ 7,350.00, R$ 978,62 - (0,133145 x rendimentos tributáveis sujeitos à incidência mensal); none above (§ 2). It applies to any resident's monthly taxable income, a foreign pension included, and says nothing about age. I publish no worked example.

The instrument. From the month of day 184, compute the carnê-leão every month on the pension received — converted by § 1 of article 53, taxed by the table, reduced by article 3-A where it applies — and pay it by the last business day of the following month through the Receita's carnê-leão system, which issues the payment slip (the DARF); keep the pension statements and the conversion sheet for the annual return. Alimony, the dependent allowance and contributions to Brazil's public social security reduce the base; they do not remove the duty.

The over-65 exemption does not cross the border — except through a treaty

Brazil exempts part of the pension income of people over sixty-five, and the summaries turn that into an “exemption threshold” for the foreign retiree. The exemption exists, and it is written with a list of payers. Law 7,713 of 1988, article 6, XV, in its current wording:

XV - os rendimentos provenientes de aposentadoria e pensão, de transferência para a reserva remunerada ou de reforma pagos pela Previdência Social da União, dos Estados, do Distrito Federal e dos Municípios, por qualquer pessoa jurídica de direito público interno ou por entidade de previdência privada, a partir do mês em que o contribuinte completar 65 (sessenta e cinco) anos de idade, sem prejuízo da parcela isenta prevista na tabela de incidência mensal do imposto, até o valor de: […] i) R$ 1.903,98 (mil, novecentos e três reais e noventa e oito centavos), por mês, a partir do mês de abril do ano-calendário de 2015;

XV – income from retirement and pensions, from transfer to the paid reserve or from retirement of military personnel, paid by the Social Security of the Union, the States, the Federal District and the Municipalities, by any legal entity of domestic public law or by a private-pension entity, from the month in which the taxpayer turns 65 (sixty-five), without prejudice to the exempt portion provided in the monthly tax table, up to the amount of: […] i) R$ 1,903.98 (one thousand nine hundred and three reais and ninety-eight centavos) a month, from the month of April of calendar year 2015;

Read the payers: Brazil's public social security at its four levels, qualquer pessoa jurídica de direito público interno — any Brazilian public-law entity — and entidade de previdência privada, a private-pension entity. Instruction 1,500 repeats the list in article 6, I — por qualquer pessoa jurídica de direito público interno ou por entidade de previdência complementar — and then, in § 3, says how it reaches a foreign payer at all: the exemption aplica-se aos rendimentos da espécie pagos por instituição equivalente a pessoa jurídica de direito público ou entidade de previdência complementar domiciliada em país que tenha com o Brasil Tratado ou Convenção internacional, o qual possua cláusula que estabeleça não discriminação no tratamento tributário entre nacionais de cada Estado Contratante que se encontrem em uma mesma situação, observados os limites e condições nele previstos — an equivalent institution in a country with a treaty containing a non-discrimination clause, within that treaty's limits. I read that paragraph as the Receita treating its own list as domestic: a foreign pension provider reaches the exemption only through such a treaty, and a foreign pension from a country with no treaty is outside item XV. Whether a specific treaty changes that is a question for that treaty's text — and the United States has none.

The Receita's answer on the point is question 174 — asked from the other side, about the non-resident with a Brazilian pension — in one line: Não. Apenas o residente no Brasil tem direito a essa isenção. The exemption has two walls: it belongs to the resident, and to the listed payers. The foreign retiree who becomes resident on day 184 passes the first wall and, absent a treaty with a non-discrimination clause, not the second; the “exemption threshold” the summaries promise is the 2026 reduction, neither an exemption nor tied to age.

The instrument. Do not claim the item XV amount against a foreign pension. If the pension comes from a treaty country, read § 3 of article 6 of Instruction 1,500 beside the treaty's non-discrimination article before claiming anything; if it comes from a country with no treaty, there is nothing to read.

Serious illness does cross it

The other exemption in article 6 of Law 7,713 has no list of payers, and the Receita says so. Question 236 of the 2026 publication:

São isentos apenas os rendimentos recebidos por pessoa física residente no Brasil, com doença grave, relativos a proventos de aposentadoria, reforma ou pensão, e suas respectivas complementações, ainda que pagas por fonte situada no exterior. […]

Only the income received by an individual resident in Brazil, with a serious illness, in respect of retirement, military-retirement or pension benefits, and their respective supplements, is exempt — even if paid by a source located abroad. […]

Three conditions and one door: residence in Brazil; a retirement benefit, a military retirement or a pension, or a supplement to one; an illness the law names — and the door, ainda que pagas por fonte situada no exterior. The list is item XIV of article 6 of Law 7,713, in the wording of Law 11,052 of 2004 (the same item covers retirement caused by an accident in service): occupational disease, active tuberculosis, mental alienation, multiple sclerosis, malignant neoplasm, blindness, leprosy, irreversible and disabling paralysis, severe heart disease, Parkinson's disease, ankylosing spondyloarthrosis, severe kidney disease, severe liver disease, advanced stages of Paget's disease (osteitis deformans), radiation contamination and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome — com base em conclusão da medicina especializada, mesmo que a doença tenha sido contraída depois da aposentadoria ou reforma, on the conclusion of specialized medicine, even if contracted after retirement; item XXI extends it to a pension when the beneficiary has one of those illnesses — exceto as decorrentes de moléstia profissional, except an occupational disease, which XXI leaves out for pensions. Instruction 1,500, article 6, II, carries the same list, with cystic fibrosis added, and states the proof: comprovada mediante laudo pericial emitido por serviço médico oficial, da União, dos estados, do Distrito Federal e dos municípios — an expert report issued by an official medical service of the Union, the states, the Federal District or the municipalities. Whether a given diagnosis falls inside the list is not mine to say: the Receita's ruling Cosit Consultation Solution 179 of 2023 says that placing a disease within the item XIV list constitui competência do serviço médico oficial da União, dos Estados, do Distrito Federal ou dos Municípios, a ser exercida mediante a emissão de laudo pericial — is the official medical service's competence, exercised through the expert report.

The instrument. An expert report — laudo pericial — from a public medical service in Brazil, not a private clinic: question 237 of the same publication says Somente podem ser aceitos laudos periciais expedidos por instituições públicas, and lists what the report must contain. With that report the foreign retirement benefit or pension is left out of the carnê-leão from the month the instruction fixes; any other income stays in.

Your 401(k), IRA or private plan: pension, or “financial investment” under Law 14,754?

The finest question in the file, and the one nobody asks before day 184. A foreign retiree rarely lives on one stream: a state benefit — Social Security, a national pension — paid monthly by an institution, and a fund the person owns — an employer plan, an individual retirement account, a private plan — from which the person draws. Two texts reach foreign income of this kind, and they tax differently. The first is the one already quoted: a pension is carnê-leão income (Instruction 208, article 16; Instruction 1,500, article 53, II; question 173). The second is Law 14,754 of 2023, whose article 3 lists what a “financial investment abroad” is:

Art. 3º Os rendimentos auferidos em aplicações financeiras no exterior pelas pessoas físicas residentes no País serão tributados na forma prevista no art. 2º desta Lei. § 1º Para fins do disposto neste artigo, consideram-se: I - aplicações financeiras no exterior: quaisquer operações financeiras fora do País, incluídos, de forma exemplificativa, depósitos bancários remunerados, […] apólices de seguro cujo principal e cujos rendimentos sejam resgatáveis pelo segurado ou pelos seus beneficiários, certificados de investimento ou operações de capitalização, fundos de aposentadoria ou pensão, títulos de renda fixa e de renda variável, […] § 2º Os rendimentos de que trata o caput deste artigo serão computados na DAA e submetidos à incidência do IRPF no período de apuração em que forem efetivamente percebidos pela pessoa física, como no recebimento de juros e outras espécies de remuneração e, em relação aos ganhos, inclusive de variação cambial sobre o principal, no resgate, na amortização, na alienação, no vencimento ou na liquidação das aplicações financeiras.

Article 3. Income earned in financial investments abroad by individuals resident in the country shall be taxed in the manner provided in article 2 of this Law. § 1. For the purposes of this article: I – financial investments abroad are any financial operations outside the country, including, by way of example, interest-bearing bank deposits, […] insurance policies whose principal and income are redeemable by the insured or by their beneficiaries, investment certificates or capitalization operations, retirement or pension funds, fixed-income and variable-income securities, […] § 2. The income of the head paragraph shall be computed in the annual return and subjected to the individual income tax in the period in which it is actually received by the individual, as on the receipt of interest and other forms of remuneration and, as to gains, including exchange variation on the principal, on the redemption, amortization, sale, maturity or settlement of the financial investments.

The words are fundos de aposentadoria ou pensão — retirement or pension funds — among deposits, insurance policies and securities, and the consequence is article 2, § 1: à alíquota de 15% (quinze por cento) sobre a parcela anual dos rendimentos, hipótese em que não será aplicada nenhuma dedução da base de cálculo — 15% on the annual amount, no deduction — and, by § 2 of article 3, when actually received: on redemption, amortization, sale, maturity or settlement. Not monthly by the table, not with the article 3-A reduction, and on the income the investment produced, not the whole draw. Normative Instruction RFB 2,180 of 2024 repeats the definition and, as far as I have read it, adds nothing to those words.

So two texts exist and neither names your plan. A benefit paid by a pension institution as a periodic entitlement reads like pension and goes to the carnê-leão; a fund you own, from which you redeem principal plus income, reads like a retirement or pension fund and goes to the 15% on the income part when redeemed. Which line reaches a given plan — an employer plan, an individual account, a plan converted into an annuity, a plan paying a fixed sum from a balance the person still owns — depends on how the plan is built and on what the person receives: a benefit, or a redemption of their own investment. I mark that reading; I do not settle it, and I classify no plan by its acronym. The two texts do not overlap: § 5 of article 53 of Instruction 1,500 removes from the carnê-leão the capital gains from the liquidação ou resgate de aplicações financeiras, adquiridos em moeda estrangeira. The choice is made per stream, on the plan's documents, before the first filing.

The instrument. Before day 184, separate your streams on paper: for each, who pays, under what title, from what — an entitlement, or a balance you own — and what the statement calls the payment. Put each stream under one of the two texts with the reason written down and keep the plan's documents with the file; the firm's non-resident and pre-immigration tax counsel exists for exactly this classification, before it is made by default.

The tax you paid abroad, and the United States without a treaty

The § 1 of article 16 quoted above gives the rule of the foreign tax credit in one sentence, with four conditions: income tax, paid, in a country with a treaty providing for the credit or where there is reciprocity, and not credited or refunded abroad. Instruction 1,500 adds the ceiling: article 65, § 2 — nos países com os quais o Brasil possui acordos, convenções ou tratados internacionais ou naqueles em que haja reciprocidade de tratamento em relação aos rendimentos produzidos no Brasil, desde que não sujeitos à restituição ou compensação no país de origem — and article 81, § 2: A compensação não pode exceder a diferença entre o valor do imposto calculado antes e depois da inclusão dos rendimentos produzidos no exterior. — no more than the difference between the Brazilian tax computed without and with the foreign income. Question 173 closes the door on the rest: Na inexistência de tratados ou reciprocidade de tratamento, não é permitida a compensação do imposto pago no exterior.

The firm's article on non-resident taxation covers Brazil's treaties and the list the Receita prints in question 136; the one sentence the American reader needs from it is that Brazil and the United States have no income tax treaty in force. That leaves reciprocity, and the Receita has done the work: question 136 names three countries for which no proof is needed — Não é necessária a prova de reciprocidade para a Alemanha, o Reino Unido e os Estados Unidos da América — and question 142 says why, for the United States:

Estados Unidos da América: a legislação federal dos Estados Unidos da América permite a dedução do tributo reconhecidamente pago no Brasil sobre receitas e rendimentos auferidos e tributados no Brasil, o que configura a reciprocidade de tratamento. O imposto pago nos Estados Unidos da América pode ser compensado com o imposto devido no Brasil, observados os limites a que se referem os arts. 15, § 1º, e 16, §§ 1º, 2º e 6º, da Instrução Normativa SRF nº 208, de 2002.

United States of America: the federal legislation of the United States of America allows the deduction of the tax demonstrably paid in Brazil on receipts and income earned and taxed in Brazil, which constitutes reciprocity of treatment. The tax paid in the United States of America may be credited against the tax due in Brazil, subject to the limits referred to in articles 15, § 1, and 16, §§ 1, 2 and 6, of Normative Instruction SRF 208 of 2002.

Read the adjective. Federal. The reciprocity the Receita recognizes is the one established by the federal income tax law of the United States, with a warning the summaries drop: A reciprocidade de tratamento não se comunica aos tributos pagos aos estados-membros e municípios. — it does not extend to state and municipal taxes. For an American retiree: federal income tax paid on the pension may be set against the Brazilian tax on the same income, within the ceiling, and only if not itself refunded or credited on the American side; a state income tax is not within the reciprocity the Receita describes. How the United States taxes Social Security or a retirement account is a question of American law this article does not answer. For other nationalities: the Receita's treaty list first, reciprocity second, proved as question 136 describes — and question 173 adds that, under a treaty, a pension for services to a Contracting State — public functions outside a business activity — falls under the treaty's “government payments” or “public functions” article, not its “pensions” article.

One agreement between Brazil and the United States does exist, and it is not about income tax: the Social Security Agreement signed in Washington on June 30, 2015 and promulgated by Decree 9,422 of June 25, 2018 — Promulga o Acordo de Previdência Social entre a República Federativa do Brasil e os Estados Unidos da América, firmado em Washington, em 30 de junho de 2015. A totalization agreement: it decides which country's social security law covers a worker, lets contribution periods be added for benefit entitlement and, in article 4, unless the Agreement provides otherwise, bars either country from restricting entitlement to or payment of a benefit only because the person resides in the other. It says nothing about the retirement visa or the income tax on a pension.

The instrument. Keep the proof of the foreign tax by month and by year — the pension statements showing the federal withholding, the filed return, the payment records — converted by § 1 of article 53, and claim the credit in the month of payment against the carnê-leão and in the annual return against the year, within the article 81 ceiling. Do not claim state tax. Do not claim a foreign tax that came back to you.

What circulates online — and how I run a retirement file

I have described what circulates — what a search for “Brazil retirement visa” returns — without naming anyone, and I keep to that; each claim is answered by its provision. “Rentista visa”, “passive or retirement income” — articles 1 and 3, III. “At least 60 years old” — a Resolution without the word age. “Add US$ 1,000 per dependent” — § 1 of article 1 of Resolution 45/2000, revoked in 2019; Resolution 40 is a text without the word dependent. “A Permanent Visa … R$ 6,000 … R$ 2,000 per additional dependent” — articles 1 and 3, sole paragraph, and article 6; the reais figures are in neither Resolution as read. “VIPER” — the Migration Law that replaced the permanent visa. “Converts to permanent residency after two years” is not what the texts say: article 142, § 3, gives renewal for up to two years or an indeterminate term, on request. “Twelve months in two years and you can apply for naturalization” — article 221. “Spend 183 days in any 12-month window, and you become a Brazilian tax resident” — article 2, III, “b”, 2, of Instruction 208: 184, in any period of up to twelve months. “Exemption threshold” — item XV's list of payers and § 3 of article 6 of Instruction 1,500; the reduction that exists is article 3-A of Law 9,250, tied to income, not age. “Your foreign pension is taxed at a flat 15%” — article 53, II, and question 173 for the pension, article 3, § 1, I, of Law 14,754 for the fund: which one applies is the question, not the answer.

How I run a retirement file. The order is the order of this article. First the status: which person in article 1 you are, proved by the pension document and the bank's letter. Then the door — the criminal-record certificate ordered and apostilled first, the post's page read against the Resolution, any requirement outside the text asked for in writing. Then the calendar, before the first flight: the day count from the first entry, the 184th day marked. Then the tax life on each side of that day: written notice of status to any Brazilian payer before it; from the month of day 184, the carnê-leão on the pension, the conversion sheet, the article 3-A reduction where it applies, the item XV amount left unclaimed unless the payer sits under a treaty with a non-discrimination clause, the foreign federal tax documented and the state tax left out. Then the streams, each placed under its text — pension or fund — with the reason written down; where it applies, the expert report from a public medical service, before the first return. And the two things the permit's text does not do — convert, or count — planned for on the ground that does. The sequence can be run from outside Brazil through a representative with specific powers.

Five mistakes we keep seeing.

1. Applying for the retirement visa on rent and dividends. Article 1 names the retiree and the survivor's pensioner; article 3, III, lets other income complement the pension — it does not replace it.

2. Rebuilding the file around a revoked formula — or an invented age. “Permanent visa” and “US$ 1,000 per dependent” are Resolution 45/2000, revoked by article 6; R$ 6,000 with R$ 2,000 per additional dependent is in neither Resolution as read and is still published on an official page. Sixty years old is in no text read for this article.

3. Reading “temporary” as “permanent”, and two years as citizenship. Renewal under the general rule is for up to two more years or an indeterminate term, on request; only the indeterminate term counts toward naturalization (article 221), and the years on the retirement visa are not counted at all.

4. Counting 183 days on a calendar year, and forgetting the carnê-leão. The rule is 184 days of presence, consecutive or not, in any period of up to twelve months; from that day the foreign pension is taxed monthly, transferred to Brazil or not.

5. Expecting the over-65 exemption on a foreign pension — and claiming state tax. Item XV lists Brazilian payers and reaches a foreign one only through a treaty with a non-discrimination clause; the serious-illness exemption, by contrast, reaches income from abroad, on a public expert report. The credit for American tax is federal only, and never for a tax refunded or credited in the United States.

The three facts that organize the retirement visa and Brazilian tax

Strip the subject to its skeleton and three facts carry everything else in this article about the Brazil retirement visa and the tax on a foreign pension:

• The retirement visa is a temporary visa for the immigrant who is retired or receives a survivor's pension and transfers at least US$ 2,000 a month to Brazil — the pension is the basis, other income only complements it, and the text contains no age, no dependent formula and no “rentista” category. CNIg Resolution 40/2019: article 1 (the two people; the monthly transfer); article 3, I to III (proof of retirement and of the ability to transfer, or of a survivor's pension in that amount; other income only to complement, if necessary); article 2 (documents); articles 3 and 4, sole paragraphs (up to two years); article 6 (Resolution 45/2000 revoked). Consular label: VITEM XIV.
• The tax is decided by the Receita Federal's clock, not by the visa: on day 184 of presence in any twelve-month window you become a tax resident taxed on worldwide income, and from that day your foreign pension enters the monthly carnê-leão, transferred to Brazil or not, with the over-65 exemption out of reach unless a treaty with a non-discrimination clause brings the payer in, and the serious-illness exemption within it. Normative Instruction SRF 208/2002, article 2, III, “b”, 2, and article 3, IV, “a”; article 16 of Instruction 208, article 53, II, of Instruction RFB 1,500/2014 and question 173; Law 11,482/2007, article 1, XII, and Law 9,250/1995, article 3-A. Law 7,713/1988, article 6, XV, and Instruction 1,500, article 6, I and § 3 (Brazilian payers only, or a treaty with a non-discrimination clause); article 6, XIV and XXI, and question 236 (serious illness, even if paid from abroad, on an official expert report).
• A foreign retirement fund sits by name in Law 14,754's list of financial investments, taxed at 15% on the income when redeemed, while a pension goes to the carnê-leão — which text reaches a given plan depends on its design; the foreign tax is credited only under a treaty or reciprocity, and the United States has no treaty but federal reciprocity; and the visa's two years neither convert by themselves nor count toward naturalization. Law 14,754/2023, article 3, § 1, I, and § 2, with article 2, § 1; Instruction 1,500, article 53, II, and question 173 — a reading marked, not settled. Instruction 208, article 16, § 1; Instruction 1,500, articles 65, § 2, and 81, § 2; questions 136 and 142. Resolution 30/2018, article 1, and Decree 9,199/2017, article 142, § 3; article 221.

Carvalho Barros Advocacia Internacional handles these files from both ends — a Brazilian practice serving clients in more than 30 countries, with residence and pre-immigration counsel that runs the sequence this article described, from the visa file built on the Resolution's two proofs to the tax life on each side of day 184 and the renewal planned with the indeterminate term in view. Written communication with the firm is in English; meetings are conducted with an interpreter at no cost to the client. You can verify the author's Brazilian bar registration yourself, by the method described in hiring a Brazilian lawyer from abroad — and no promise of outcome is made or implied anywhere in this article.

Frequently asked questions

About the author

Luiz Alberto de Carvalho Barros Filho

Attorney at Law — Brazilian Bar (OAB/AL 7.530)

Brazilian attorney dedicated to private international law and cross-border taxation. Published author in the International Law Deskbook 2.0 (The Florida Bar) and contributor to the International Law Quarterly, also of The Florida Bar.

More about the firm

Legal note. This article is informational and does not replace individual legal advice, and it makes no promise as to the outcome of any visa application, renewal, filing or assessment (Brazilian Bar Provision OAB No. 205/2021). The provisions supporting it — CNIg Resolution No. 40 of October 2, 2019 (articles 1 to 7); CNIg Resolution No. 30 of June 12, 2018 (heading and article 1); the Migration Law, Law No. 13,445/2017 (article 14); its regulation, Decree No. 9,199/2017 (articles 142, § 3, and 221); Normative Instruction SRF No. 208/2002 (articles 2, III, “b”, 2; 3, IV, “a”, and § 2; and 16 and §§ 1 and 5); Normative Instruction RFB No. 1,500/2014 (articles 6, I, II and § 3; 53, II, and §§ 1 and 5; 54; 55; 65, § 2; and 81 and § 2); Law No. 7,713/1988 (article 6, XIV, XV and XXI); Law No. 11,482/2007 (article 1, XII, in the wording of Law No. 15,191/2025); Law No. 9,250/1995 (article 3-A, inserted by Law No. 15,270/2025); Law No. 14,754/2023 (articles 2, § 1, and 3, § 1, I, and § 2); the Social Security Agreement between Brazil and the United States, promulgated by Decree No. 9,422/2018; the Receita Federal’s Questions and Answers on the 2026 individual income tax return (version 1.00 of April 23, 2026, questions 136, 142, 173, 174, 236 and 237); Cosit Consultation Solution No. 179 of August 16, 2023; and the pages of the Brazilian Consulates in Houston and Porto and of the Brazilian Embassies in Stockholm and Abu Dhabi on the Foreign Ministry’s portal — were checked against official sources on September 17, 18 and 20, 2026, with the provisions the argument rests on named in the text itself. Portuguese passages, whether in blocks or inline, are reproduced from the official texts; English passages shown in quotation marks are the author’s working translation, except the Houston, Stockholm and Abu Dhabi pages, which are quoted in their own English. The Portuguese is the only authoritative version, and any emphasis within the quotations is the author’s. This is an original article, not an adaptation: the firm has no Portuguese-language article on the foreign retiree in Brazil, and every provision cited here was verified for this article. Method caveats and declared limits. (i) The CNIg Resolutions were read in the Ministry of Justice’s digital library (DSpace), because the immigration portal’s links deliver the portal’s page shell instead of the document; the repository records no express revocation of Resolution 40, and Resolution 40 itself, in article 6, revoked Resolution 45/2000; nothing more is asserted about its currency — Resolutions 41/2019, 49/2024, 50/2024 and 51/2025 were not read; Resolution 45/2000 was read in the repository’s copy of the Official Gazette page of March 16, 2000 (optical text, quoted only in the two passages shown); later amendments of Resolution 45/2000, if any, were not read; Resolution 1/2017 was not read. (ii) Resolution 30/2018 was read in the Official Gazette page held by the repository, whose columns are interleaved; each quoted fragment was located line by line, and its later amendment was not read. (iii) The consular pages were read in the versions published on the government’s site — Houston updated August 26, 2022; Porto updated June 11, 2025; Stockholm updated July 6, 2026; Abu Dhabi published August 4, 2022 — and the article says what those pages publish, not what any post requires today; consular practice post by post, including which benefits a given post accepts as “retirement”, was not verified. (iv) Normative Instructions 208/2002 and 1,500/2014 were read through the Receita Federal’s legislation service in their multi-version text; Normative Instruction RFB 2,180/2024 was read only as to its definition of financial investments abroad, which repeats the law’s. (v) Cosit Consultation Solution 179/2023 was read in the official PDF and is cited only for the competence to issue the expert report; the statement that the serious-illness exemption reaches income paid by a source abroad is the Receita Federal’s, in question 236. (vi) A consultation answer on a pension paid by a foreign social-security institution that English-language material cites was not located in the official repository and is not cited. (vii) Whether a particular benefit is “retirement” for the consular authority, whether a given plan is a pension or a “retirement or pension fund” under Law 14,754, and whether any tax treaty alters the over-65 exemption for a given payer are questions the texts do not answer and this article does not decide; the treatment of Social Security or retirement accounts under United States law is not addressed. (viii) No computation of tax is published, no consular or processing fee is stated, and no processing time is stated. (ix) The descriptions of what circulates in English-language material on this subject reflect the firm’s documented review of the leading results for the relevant searches, conducted in September 2026; no source is named, and each claim is answered by the provision rather than by its author. To review your specific case, contact attorney Luiz Barros — Brazilian Bar, OAB/AL 7.530.